Nikon 70-300 Mm F/4-56g Zoom Lens With Auto Focus for Nikon Dslr Review
Nikon lxx-300mm f/iv.5-5.6G
FX (2000-)
Intro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
Nikon 70-300mm f/four.5-5.6 G (62mm filters, 17 oz./480g, 4.9'/1.5m close focus, almost $170). bigger. I'd get mine at Adorama, at Amazon or at B&H.
This ad-free website's biggest source of support is when y'all use those or whatsoever of these links to my personally-canonical sources when you go anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Nikon does not seal its boxes in any mode, so never buy at retail or whatever other source not on my personally approved listing since you'll have no way of knowing if you're missing accessories, getting a lacking, damaged, returned, non-U.s.a., shop demo or used lens. Become yours merely from the approved sources I apply myself for the best prices, service, render policies and selection. Thank you for helping me help you! Ken.
Apr 2018 Nikon Reviews Nikon Lenses Nikon Flash All Reviews
Introduction
AcmeIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
This lens simply costs nigh $170 brand new. I've used this lens and it works just great on FX if you're cheap, especially if you lot apply a tripod.
For DX digital cameras, go a DX lens, not this 1.
The 70-300mm Yard is very lightweight and has a broad zoom range. At 200mm - 300mm it's soft at big apertures, which may be great for portraits only bad for landscapes. If using it for landscapes but put it on a tripod and end down to f/11 at 300mm.
If you lot want complete sharpness wide open at 200 mm and beyond get either of the newest FX 70-300mm AF-P VR or DX 70-300mm AF-P VR.
Nikon lxx-300mm Chiliad. overstate.
Format
TopIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
This is a full frame FX lens, and I'm reviewing it as such.
It usually works on DX cameras, but whatever DX tele works much better.
Compatibility
PeakIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Functioning Compared Recommendations
This lens works perfectly with every FX digital camera.
Information technology also works on amend DX cameras, but won't autofocus on many DX cameras. For DX cameras, whatsoever DX telephoto is worlds ahead of this lens.
This lens works great with most 35mm autofocus cameras, but won't work with any manual-focus cameras.
See Nikon Lens Compatibility for details on your camera. Read down the "AF, AF-D (screw)"and "G" columns.
Specifications
PinnacleIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
Name
Nikon calls this the Nikon AF Nikkor 70-300mm f/four-five.6G.
AF: Autofocus.
NIKKOR: Nikon's brand name for all their lenses.
G: Gelded; has no aperture ring.
Optics
thirteen elements in 9 groups.
Front end-group focus.
Pumper zoom.
Coverage
FX, 35mm and DX.
Diaphragm
9 direct blades.
Close Focus
4.nine feet (1.5m), which is pretty expert at 300mm.
Filters
Plastic 62 mm filter thread.
Hood
Nikon HB-26 hood.
It takes the HB-26 hood which seems identical to the HB-15 hood of the seventy-300 ED lens.
Size
iv.6" (117mm) long past 2.ix" (74mm) around.
Weight
17 oz (480g).
Nikon Product Number
1928.
Price, United states
$170, April 2018.
$140, Apr 2008 (t he grayness-market version was the deal of the century for but $110 hither).
Nikon 70-300mm G Usa box.
Performance
TopIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
Overall Autofocus Distortion Maximum Apertures
Mechanics Vibration Reduction Sharpness
Overall
Performance top
Fine at most focal lengths, soft at 200 to 300 mm wide open. Stop it down for best results at longer zoom settings.
Autofocus
Performance summit
Autofocus speed is identical to the 70-300mm f/iv-5.6D ED AF, which is slow.
One full plough of the AF screw brings 1 from infinity to twoscore anxiety.
The seventy-210mm f/four-5.6D AF is much, much faster.
Distortion
Performance top
On DX:
70mm: tiny fleck of barrel distortion
90mm: no distortion.
100mm: fairly neutral, only the tiniest scrap of pincushion.
135mm: very minor pincushion
200mm: pincushion
300mm: pincushion
Maximum Apertures
Performance top
70mm: f/four
100mm: f/iv.2
135mm: f/four.2
200mm: f/five
240mm: f/v.three
300mm: f/5.6
Mechanical Quality
Performance top
Plastic mountain.
Hood
Plastic bayonet.
Front Bumper
None.
Filter Threads
Plastic.
Hood Bayonet Mount
Plastic.
Front Butt
Plastic.
Focus Ring
Plastic.
Zoom Ring
Rubber-covered plastic.
Rear Barrel
Plastic.
Identity
Printed around the barrel near the mount.
Internals
Plastic.
Clay Seal at Mount
No.
Mount
Nikon seventy-300mm G plastic mountain.
Plastic.
Markings
Pigment.
Series Number
Nikon 70-300mm 1000 bottom.
Sticker glued into recess in the bottom of the lens butt.
Made in
China.
Vibration Reduction
operation top
On my D70 I can mitt-hold it fine down to about 1/125 at 300 mm, at which point but about 50% of my shots are clear.
Light weight works against you here, since a heavier lens would do a amend job of stabilizing the setup.
Of course the 80 - 400 VR lens stabilizes everything, only for over ten times the price you get less than ten times the stabilization with the fourscore - 400 VR.
Sharpness
Functioning elevation
Equally tested on a DX digital photographic camera.
Information technology will be difficult for many people to get abrupt images at the longer focal lengths because 1 volition demand to employ smaller apertures, simply that leads to longer shutter speeds and more potential for blur. Blur is besides a trouble considering this such a lightweight lens. Big fat telephotos help stabilize camera milkshake due to their weight alone, and others incorporate boosted special active stabilization. This $170 Thousand lens has none of that, then don't blame softness on just the lens since it only as probable could exist your technique.
lxx mm:
f/4: sharp center, a picayune soft corners
f/v.6: sharp center, just a tad softer in the farthest corners
f/viii: precipitous all over
f/eleven: sharp all over
100 mm:
f/4.ii: sharp centre, softer corners
f/five.six: abrupt all over, a little fleck softer corners
f/8: abrupt all over
f/11: sharp all over
135 mm:
f/four.2: reasonably sharp center, soft corners
f/5.6: reasonably sharp center, slightly soft corners
f/8: abrupt center, slightly softer corners
200 mm:
f/5: soft; secondary lateral chromatic abnormality
f/five.vi: soft; secondary lateral chromatic abnormality
f/8: reasonably abrupt and less secondary lateral chromatic aberration
f/11: reasonably abrupt.
300 mm:
f/5.half-dozen: Soft, or pleasant spherical aberration for portraits. Secondary lateral chromatic aberration.
f/8: Soft. Secondary lateral chromatic aberration.
f/11: Much better, nevertheless has secondary lateral chromatic aberration.
At 300 mm focus isn't always dead-on, either. Scout out for narrow depth of field likewise at f/5.6. Attempt f/five.6 for deliberate soft focus effects, since that'southward what happens at f/5.6.
Compared
TopIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Operation Compared Recommendations
Information technology seems identical to the $310 AF 70-300mm f/4-five.6D ED with the exception of being half the price and having a plastic lens mount bayonet instead of metallic. The ED version is also generally plastic. Even the hoods and AF gearing are the same.
I doubt the glass is any different between the ED and this G version. Remember that the ED version actually seems to be made by Tamron and only one modest internal element claims to exist ED probably for marketing and promotional reasons, non whatever of the important front elements. I don't actually consider that the "ED" moniker means annihilation on the ED version.
The simply visible differences between the One thousand and ED are:
1.) ED lens has metal mount, G has plastic. (also a slight deviation in weight)
2.) ED has discontinuity band, G does non. The G is easier to utilize for cameras fabricated in the by x years, and the ED can work even on aboriginal and manual focus film cameras.
The similarities are:
1.) Same specs for number of lens groups and elements
2.) Same size
3.) Same AF speed and gearing
4.) Same close focus altitude
five.) Same nice 9-blade diaphragm
6.) Looks like the aforementioned optics within and identical movement of the lens groups while zooming and focusing
Aye, compared to a professional lens like the huge $900 fourscore - 200 mm f/ii.8 or $i,500 eighty - 400 VR it'due south dinky.
This is Nikon's cheapest and nastiest 70-300mm lens ever. In the right hands information technology takes great pictures, but practise accept a look at the new state-of-the-fine art FX 70-300mm AF-P VR and DX 70-300mm AF-P VR for much improve results, peculiarly because of Vibration Reduction.
Recommendations
TopIntro Format Compatibility Specs
Performance Compared Recommendations
If you are looking for a cheap, lightweight zoom for moving-picture show or FX this is fantabulous for the cost. I can't see whatever reason to buy the so-called ED version over this except for the metal mountain and compatibility with my manual focus cameras.
For DX digital cameras, I'd suggest any Vibration Reduction (VR) lens instead, particularly the 55-300mm VR or DX 70-300mm AF-P VR.
For $170 US how can you lot go incorrect? Idiots on eBay keep behest the prices of these up above what they could buy them for new from a legitimate dealer! Endeavor i and if you lot hate it send it back.
If yous stop it down a little or don't zoom across 200 mm its images await the same as the $i,000 lenses. Simply don't expect information technology to last in heavy, daily professional corruption.
It keeps your coin in your pocket where it belongs. Yous could spend a week in France for the $i,000 difference and make a zillion heart-popping photos you wouldn't become with a more than expensive lens sitting at habitation. It'due south well worth the $170 - on FX. Don't use this on DX; use a DX lens.
I use a clear (UV) protective filter instead of a cap. I only employ a cap when I throw this in my bag, otherwise I leave a articulate filter on my lens at all times.
The very best protective filter is the Hoya multicoated HD3 62mm UV which uses hardened glass and repels clay and fingerprints.
For less money, the B+W 62mm 010 is an fantabulous filter, as are the multicoated version and the basic multicoated Hoya filters, but the Hoya HD3 is the toughest and the best.
Filters last a lifetime, so yous may besides get the best. The Hoya HD3 stays cleaner than the others since information technology repels oil and dirt. Even if it costs half as much every bit this lens, you lot'll exist using this filter long subsequently you've replaced this lens.
I'd become my 70-300 at Adorama, at Amazon or at B&H.
This ad-free website'due south biggest source of support is when y'all employ those or any of these links to approved sources when you go anything, regardless of the state in which you live. Nikon does not seal its boxes in any way, so never buy at retail or any other source not on my personally canonical list since you'll have no way of knowing if you're missing accessories, getting a defective, damaged, returned, non-Us, store demo or used lens. I apply the stores I do considering they ship from secure remote warehouses where no 1 gets to impact your new photographic camera before you do. Purchase only from the canonical sources I use myself for the best prices, service, return policies and option.
Thank you for helping me help you!
Ken, Mrs. Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.
© Ken Rockwell. All rights reserved. Tous droits réservés. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Help Me Assist Yous
I back up my growing family through this website, equally crazy equally information technology might seem.
The biggest help is when you use whatever of these links when you become annihilation. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of back up. These places always have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.
If you find this folio equally helpful equally a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may accept had to take, feel free to help me go along helping everyone.
If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you lot're family. It'due south keen people like you who permit me to keep adding to this site total-time. Thanks!
If y'all haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.
As this folio is copyrighted and formally registered, information technology is unlawful to make copies, particularly in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you lot are granted i-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!
Thanks for reading!Mr. & Mrs. Ken Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.
Source: https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm
0 Response to "Nikon 70-300 Mm F/4-56g Zoom Lens With Auto Focus for Nikon Dslr Review"
Post a Comment